Davis v. Edmondson , 261 Pa. 199 ( 1918 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam,

    The correct conclusion of the learned court below was that it clearly appears from plaintiff’s statement of his cause of action that the injuries he sustained were due to his carelessness or negligence, and the judgment, which was properly entered under the Act of May 14,1915, P. L. 488, is affirmed.