-
Per Curiam, The three questions set forth in appellants’ statement of the questions involved in this appeal — and we can consider no others — are correctly answered by the learned president judge of the court below in his opinions denying a new trial and overruling the motion for judgment for the defendant n. o. v. On these opinions the judgment on the verdict is affirmed.
Document Info
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 289
Citation Numbers: 262 Pa. 381, 105 A. 505, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 655
Judges: Brown, Fox, Frazer, Moschzisker, Simpson, Walling
Filed Date: 10/23/1918
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024