-
Opinion by
Orlady, J., On the trial before the jury, the question of the effect
*220 of the defendant’s plea of the statute of limitations, was reserved by the court, and on hearing of a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto it was held to be a bar to the action. We adopt the interpretation of the contract as made by Judge Evans for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by him, and affirm the judgment.
Document Info
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 185
Citation Numbers: 61 Pa. Super. 215, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 301
Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Rice, Trexler
Filed Date: 10/11/1915
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024