eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 Federal Courts
 US Court of Appeals Cases
 Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
 1994-04

resolution-trust-corp-v-dunmar-corp-and-michael-d-jones ( 1994 )


Menu:

  • 20 F.3d 397

    RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Plaintiff,
    v.
    DUNMAR CORP. and Michael D. Jones, Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs,
    The First F.A., Defendant-Counterclaim Defendant,
    Sherman Dantzler and Jack Shirek, Defendants,
    and
    The First F.A. of Orlando and Resolution Trust Corp.,
    Counter-Defendants.
    Michael D. JONES; Robert S. Guskiewicz; R.S. Futch, Jr.,
    Plaintiffs-Appellants,
    v.
    RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Philip DONLEVY; William Crawford; Robert Stone, Defendants,
    v.
    SEMINOLE FLYING AND SOARING, INC., and The First F.A. of
    Orlando, Third Party Defendants.
    RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee,
    v.
    LAKE PICKETT, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership; Michael
    D. Jones, as general partner, d/b/a Lake Pickett, Ltd., a
    Florida Limited Partnership; Michael D. Jones, individually
    and as Trustee, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants,
    The First F.A. of Orlando, Defendant.

    No. 91-3924.

    United States Court of Appeals,
    Eleventh Circuit.

    April 12, 1994.

    Broad and Cassel, Brenda Lee London, Robert D. Gatton, Orlando, FL, for appellants.

    Giles, Hedrick & Robinson, P.A., Orlando, FL, E. Givens Goodspeed, Kirk K. Van Tine, Baker & Botts, Washington, DC, for appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Nos. 89-205-Civ-Orl-19, 89-207-Civ-Orl-19, 89-208-Civ-Orl-19), Patricia C. Fawsett, Judge.

    ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

    (Opinion November 23, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993, 7 F.3d 1006)

    Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

    BY THE COURT:

    1

    A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

    2

    IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.