United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-Appellee ( 1998 )


Menu:
  • EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge,

    concurring:

    Today’s court relies heavily on what we see as the plain language of the pertinent statute. I agree with the opinion and with the result. But I point out that we do not have before us today a statute that was enacted long ago. When those much older statutes are being construed by modern courts, our response as modern readers to the words of *1321the statute may not be what the words meant to the Congress speaking at a very different time; and the idea of plain meaning becomes far more complicated.

Document Info

Docket Number: 94-3139

Judges: Hatchett, Tjoflat, Anderson, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes, Barkett, Hull, Marcus

Filed Date: 7/29/1998

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024