Forbes v. Napolitano ( 2001 )


Menu:
  • 260 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2001)

    FRED FORBES; MARGARET BOHN; JOHN L. SUMMERS; ANN S. ANDERSON, STUART R. SNIDER; GEORGE MELCHER, JR.; CHRISTOPHER TISCH; PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRALAND NORTHERN ARIZONA, INC.; ROBERT TAMIS, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
    v.
    JANET NAPOLITANO, in her capacity as Attorney General, State of Arizona; STEPHEN NEELY, in his capacity as County Attorney, Pima County, Arizona, Defendants-Appellants.

    No. 99-17372

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

    Argued and Submitted October 3, 2000--San Francisco, California
    Filed December 29, 2000
    Order Amending Opinion Filed April 11, 2001
    Second Amendment Filed August 9, 2001

    NOTE: SEE OPINIONS AT 236 F.3d 1009, AND 247 F.3d 903.

    Bebe J. Anderson, The Center for Reproductive Law & Policy, New York, N.Y. and Michael Owen Miller, Miller Smith LLP, Tucson, Arizona, for the plaintiffs-appellees.

    Charles R. Pyle, Assistant Attorney General, Tucson, Arizona, for the defendants-appellants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona William D. Browning, District Judge, Presiding, D.C. No. CV-96-00288-WDB

    Before: Joseph T. Sneed, Mary M. Schroeder, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.

    Prior report: 236 F.3d 1009 SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.

    1

    The opinion filed December 29, 2000 is amended as follows: at page 4510 of the slip opinion, lines 5-6 from the bottom, after the cite to City of Chicago v. Morales, add the parenthetical "(plurality)", so that it reads: City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41, 52, 119 S. Ct. 1849, 144 L. Ed. 2d 67 (1999) (plurality).

    2

    The mandate may now issue.