-
7 U.S. 179 (____) 3 Cranch 179 RAY
v.
LAW.Supreme Court of United States.
C. Lee, for the petitioner, contended, that this was a final decree as to Ray, and cited 2 Fowler's Exchequer Practice, 195, to show, that such a decree would, in England, be considered such a final decree as would authorise an appeal.
March 5.
MARSHALL, Ch. J.
We can do nothing without seeing the record, and the papers offered cannot be considered by us as a record.
*180 The court, however, is of opinion, that a decree for a sale under a mortgage, is such a final decree as may be appealed from. We suppose, that when the court below understands that to be our opinion, it will allow an appeal, if it be a case to which this opinion applies.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 7 U.S. 179, 2 L. Ed. 404, 3 Cranch 179, 1805 U.S. LEXIS 250
Judges: Marshall
Filed Date: 3/18/1805
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024