United States v. Bickel , 1990 CMA LEXIS 1013 ( 1990 )

COX, Judge

(concurring):

I write only to indicate that, in my view, the fact that appellant’s commander issued the policy prior to the first urinalysis is not determinative, albeit it is good evidence of a legitimate purpose. The question is always whether the urinalysis is a legitimate inspection, a reasonable search, or something else — whether or not such a policy had previously been announced.