State v. Anderson ( 2003 )


Menu:
  • SANDSTROM, Justice,

    concurring in the result.

    [¶ 19] Because the majority identifies the victim of these sex crimes with unnecessary specificity, I concur in the result. I cannot join in an opinion that I believe unnecessarily sacrifices the victim’s privacy-

    [¶ 20] DALE V. SANDSTROM.

Document Info

Docket Number: 20020229

Judges: Kapsner, Vande Walle, Maring, Neumann, Sandstrom

Filed Date: 3/5/2003

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024