-
The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered, November 7th Í877,
Per Curiam. — This case falls directly within the ruling in the case of Seely v. City of Pittsburgh, 1 Norris 360, that the per foot front rule of assessment is inapplicable to lands such as those along Hazelwood avenue.
The payment by Kaiser of the assessment of $906.93 was volun
*369 tary, the lien upon the premises, even if rightly assessed, having expired at the time of payment.On both grounds the court below was right.
Judgment affirmed.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 2
Citation Numbers: 85 Pa. 366, 1877 Pa. LEXIS 261
Judges: Agnew, Gordon, Mercur, Paxson, Sharswood, Sterrett, Woodward
Filed Date: 10/30/1877
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024