Roland v. Lancaster Co. N. Bank , 135 Pa. 598 ( 1890 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam :

    This case does not require discussion. The plaintiff had a *601full, adequate, and convenient remedy at law, and the court below committed no error in dismissing his bill for want of jurisdiction.

    Decree affirmed and the appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 51

Citation Numbers: 135 Pa. 598, 19 A. 951, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1225

Judges: Clark, Collum, Green, Jjt, Paxson, Sterrett

Filed Date: 6/2/1890

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024