Dull v. Ulshafer , 140 Pa. 537 ( 1891 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam:

    We think the portion of the charge referred to in the first assignment was fully warranted by the evidence. The remaining assignment alleges that the court erred in not giving a binding instruction in favor of the defendants. We cannot say there was error in this, as the case was one for a jury. It does not require discussion.

    Judgment affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 355

Citation Numbers: 140 Pa. 537, 21 A. 447, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 868

Judges: McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Filed Date: 3/9/1891

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024