Oswalt ex rel. Hugg v. Hartford Fire Insurance , 175 Pa. 427 ( 1896 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam,

    An examination of the testimony in this case, with special reference to the several assignments of error, has failed to convince us that there is anything in either of the learned trial judge’s rulings that requires a reversal of the judgment.

    Judgment affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal, No. 248

Citation Numbers: 175 Pa. 427, 34 A. 735, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1267

Judges: Dean, Fell, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett

Filed Date: 5/11/1896

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/13/2024