Eshleman v. Union Stock Yards Co. , 222 Pa. 20 ( 1908 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam,

    We are of opinion that the testimony offered at the trial did not establish the plaintiff’s right to recover, and that a nonsuit was properly entered for reasons stated in the opinion of the learned trial judge.

    The judgment is affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal, No. 263

Citation Numbers: 222 Pa. 20, 70 A. 899, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 652

Judges: Brown, Elkin, Fell, Potter, Stewart

Filed Date: 6/2/1908

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024