Ignash v. Murphy, Cook & Co. , 1915 Pa. LEXIS 705 ( 1915 )

Per Curiam,

The nonsuit in this case was entered because it was manifest from the testimony that the plaintiff continued to work at a place which he knew to be dangerous, and voluntarily took the chance of being injured. He showed nothing making the defendants liable for the consequences of his. rashness in continuing at the dangerpus post. The judgment is¿ therefore, affirmed.