Christy v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. , 249 Pa. 245 ( 1915 )

Per Curiam,

In this action of trespass to recover for damages done to property which appellant alleges in his statement of claim he owns, there was a verdict in his favor. Subsequently judgment was entered for the defendant non obstante veredicto, for the' reason that the plaintiff had failed to show title to the property upon which he alleges an additional servitude was imposed. This action of the court was proper, and its judgment is now affirmed.