Commonwealth v. Stidham ( 1992 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in Commonwealth v. Corporan, — Pa. -, 613 A.2d 530 (1992), we affirm.

    NIX, C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. ZAPPALA, J., concurs in the result. CAPPY, J., notes his dissent.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal No. 129 E.D. Appeal Docket 1991

Judges: Cappy, Consideration, Flaherty, Larsen, Matter, McDermott, Nix, Notes, Papadakos, Zappala

Filed Date: 6/17/1992

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/13/2024