Commonwealth v. Reed , 573 Pa. 654 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  • *655 ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. Petitioner alleged a manifestly unreasonable and excessive sentence, supported by a Pa.R.A.P 2119(f) statement to the Superior Court, but was denied review pursuant to Commonwealth v. Burton, 770 A.2d 771 (Pa.Super.2001) (claim of excessiveness fails to raise substantial question when within statutory limits). The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED for review consistent with Commonwealth v. Mouzon, 571 Pa. 419, 812 A.2d 617 (2002) (Opinion Announcing Judgment of the Court). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Document Info

Docket Number: Petition No. 553 EAL 2002

Citation Numbers: 573 Pa. 654, 828 A.2d 1006, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 1239

Filed Date: 7/21/2003

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024