-
*183 ORDERPER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2014, the Order of the Superior Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Justice STEVENS files a Concurring Statement. Justice STEVENS, concurring. I join this Court’s per curiam affirmance. Nevertheless, I wish to emphasize my view that the communication of threats made by a probationer to an intended victim is not a requirement to find the probationer engaged in “assaultive behavior” in violation of the general condition for special probation or parole set forth in 37 Pa.Code § 65.4(5)(iii).
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 26 WAP 2013
Judges: Baer, Castille, Eakin, Files, McCaffery, Saylor, Stevens, Todd
Filed Date: 4/29/2014
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024