Hody Et Ux. v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co. , 318 Pa. 272 ( 1935 )


Menu:
  • These two appeals are similar in practically all respects to Smith v. Pgh. Rys. Co., 314 Pa. 541, and are respectively affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in those appeals by Mr. Justice DREW and reported as above indicated.

    Judgment affirmed. *Page 273

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeals, 29 and 30

Citation Numbers: 178 A. 302, 318 Pa. 272, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 564

Judges: Drew, Frazer, Kephart, Linn, Maxey, Schaeeer, Simpson

Filed Date: 3/27/1935

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024