Palandro v. Bollinger , 409 Pa. 296 ( 1962 )


Menu:
  • *300Dissenting Opinion by

    Mr. Chief Justice Bell:

    I dissent — the jury specifically found plaintiff (and defendant) were guilty of negligence. If the admission of testimony that plaintiffs full salary and all of his expenses had been paid was error, it was clearly harmless error.

    Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones joins in this dissenting opinion.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal, 84

Citation Numbers: 409 Pa. 296, 186 A.2d 11, 1962 Pa. LEXIS 444

Judges: Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Keim

Filed Date: 11/28/1962

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/13/2024