Commonwealth v. Price , 463 Pa. 171 ( 1975 )


Menu:
  • MANDERINO, Justice

    (dissenting).

    I dissent. The majority opinion asserts that the filing of post-verdict motions in the instant case was illusory and therefore this Court is unable to pass on the merits of the issues raised. I believe that the case should be remanded for filing of “proper” post-verdict motions. We should not presume from a silent record that post-verdict motions have been validly waived.

Document Info

Docket Number: 19

Citation Numbers: 344 A.2d 479, 463 Pa. 171, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 968

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Roberts

Filed Date: 10/3/1975

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/13/2024