Commonwealth v. Jordan, G., Pet ( 2020 )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 269 WAL 2020
:
Respondent :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal
: from the Order of the Superior Court
v. :
:
:
GREGORY JORDAN, :
:
Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:
Whether the Superior Court panel erred as a matter of law in concluding
that inconsistent verdicts are always permissible in consolidated jury/bench
trials pursuant to Commonwealth v. Yachymiak, 505 A.2d 1024 (Pa. Super.
1986) and Commonwealth v. Wharton, 594 A.2d 696 (Pa. Super. 1991),
particularly where a different panel of the Superior Court reached the exact
opposite conclusion in Commonwealth v. Rankin, [235 A.3d 373 (Pa. Super.
2020)]?