Com. v. All that Certain Lot or Parcel of Land Located at 2322 Easton Tpk. Waymart, Wayne County, PA Appeal of: A.J. Pozza ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania             :
    :
    v.                          : No. 975 C.D. 2017
    :
    All that Certain Lot or Parcel of Land :
    Located at 2322 Easton Turnpike          :
    Waymart, Wayne County, Pennsylvania :
    and Described with Particularity at Deed :
    Book 318, Pages 444-447, in the Office :
    of the Recorder of Deeds, Wayne          :
    County, Pennsylvania, Tax Map            :
    No. 24-0-0271-0039                       :
    :
    Appeal of: Angelo J. Pozza               :
    PER CURIAM                                                            FILED: April 20, 2018
    MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
    Before this Court is the appeal of Angelo J. Pozza, who challenges an
    order of the Court of Common Pleas of Wayne County directing the forfeiture of
    certain of his property pursuant to Sections 6801 and 6802 of the former act
    commonly known as the Controlled Substances Forfeiture Act, 42 Pa. C.S. §§6801-
    6802.1 Appellant asserts that this forfeiture exacted an excessive fine in violation of
    the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 13 of
    the Pennsylvania Constitution. On May 25, 2017, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    issued its ruling in Commonwealth v. 1997 Chevrolet and Contents Seized from
    Young, 
    160 A.3d 153
    , 192 (Pa. 2017) (Young), which, inter alia, directed a remand
    to the trial court because it “did not have the benefit of our explication” of the
    1
    Former Sections 6801 and 6802 of the Forfeiture Act were repealed by the Act of June 29, 2017,
    P.L. 247. The new version of the Forfeiture Act, which became effective July 1, 2017, is codified
    at 42 Pa. C.S. §§5801-5808.
    constitutional analysis to be applied. Likewise, here, the Court of Common Pleas of
    Wayne County did not have the benefit of the Supreme Court’s analysis in Young
    when it issued its order on March 3, 2017. Accordingly, the order of the trial court
    will be vacated for a new consideration of Appellant’s constitutional challenge to
    the forfeiture of his property using the Supreme Court’s explication in Young, 
    160 A.3d 153
    .
    ORDER
    AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2018, the order of the Court of
    Common Pleas of Wayne County, dated March 3, 2017, is hereby VACATED and
    this matter is REMANDED for proceedings using the specific factors set forth in
    Young, 
    160 A.3d 153
    .
    Jurisdiction relinquished.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 975 C.D. 2017

Judges: PER CURIAM

Filed Date: 4/20/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/20/2018