Hill v. Ramsey ( 1839 )

The Court

said that the act of 20th March, 1725, about writs of summons and arrests having been revived by the act of 14th April, 1838, (Stroud's Purd. tit. Motion), it became necessary to adopt the practice which had prevailed under the former act. The court stated it to be as is noted at the beginning of the report of this case.