Anderson v. McMichael , 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 319 ( 1897 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam,

    The question raised by the motion to quash is ruled by our decision in Yost v. Davison, 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, and the cases there cited, and needs no discussion. The order appealed from is neither a final judgment nor an order in the nature of a final judgment, but is interlocutory, and from it an independent appeal does not lie.

    The appeal is quashed at the cost of the appellant and the record remitted with a procedendo.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal, No. 154

Citation Numbers: 6 Pa. Super. 114, 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 319

Judges: Beaveb, Oblad, Pobteb, Reedeb, Rice, Smith, Wickham

Filed Date: 12/13/1897

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024