Campbell v. Harton , 1905 Pa. Super. LEXIS 402 ( 1905 )

Per Curiam,

This case was tried at the same time in the court below as Hartón v. Hartón, ante, p. 492. It was argued in this court also at the same time.

The indorsement “Bill sealed for defendants generally” is made upon the opinion of the court, refusing a new trial. It is not dated, and, whenever and however made, is no more than in No. 235 a compliance with our rule.

For the reasons therein stated, therefore, the motion to quash must be allowed. Appeal quashed.