Tobin v. Tobin ( 1906 )


Menu:
  • Pee Cueiam,

    This is an appeal from an order discharging a rule to show cause why service of the subpoena in divorce should not be set aside. Such order is clearly interlocutory, and not the subject of an independent appeal: Lycoming Fire Insurance Co. v. Storrs, 97 Pa. 354; Phila. & Reading R. R. Co. v. Snowdon, 161 Pa. 201; Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co., 191 Pa. 215. Therefore the motion to quash the appeal must be sustained.

    Appeal quashed, the costs to be paid by the appellant.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal, No. 31

Judges: Ady, Cueiam, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Ort, Porter, Rice

Filed Date: 12/10/1906

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/13/2024