Sweeney v. Arrowsmith , 1910 Pa. Super. LEXIS 38 ( 1910 )


Menu:
  • Opinion by

    Oblad y, J.,

    After a careful examination of this record, a majority of the court are of the opinion that the conclusion reached by the court below is a correct one, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal, No. 220

Citation Numbers: 43 Pa. Super. 268, 1910 Pa. Super. LEXIS 38

Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Oblad, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Filed Date: 7/20/1910

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024