Ohio Salt Co. v. Carrigan , 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 60 ( 1916 )


Menu:
  • Opinion by

    Orlady, P. J.,

    For the reasons given in the opinion of the court below, (Audenried, P. J.) in making absolute the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, the judgment is affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal, No. 82

Citation Numbers: 65 Pa. Super. 270, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 60

Judges: Head, Henderson, Kepiiart, Orlady, Porter, Trexler, Williams

Filed Date: 12/18/1916

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024