-
Dissenting Opinion by
Montgomery, J.: The arrest in this case was admittedly unlawful since the warrant was not based on a sufficient com
*147 plaint. Therefore, it was properly resisted. I cannot justify a conviction on the assumption that appellant had no knowledge of the fact that the complaint had not been signed by his wife. It is just as reasonable to assume that he knew his wife had not gone to the office of the Justice of the Peace to swear out a warrant.The appellant was found not guilty of the charge of assault and battery. I would grant his motion in arrest of judgment and discharge him on the charge of resisting arrest.
Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
Document Info
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 739
Citation Numbers: 215 Pa. Super. 146, 257 A.2d 612, 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1092
Judges: Cercone, Hoepman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright
Filed Date: 9/11/1969
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024