-
Order affirmed.
HOFFMAN, J., dissented because there were sufficient issues of fact which, if the jury resolved them in appellant’s favor, would create liability. WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Document Info
Docket Number： Appeal, No. 1068
Judges： Appellant, Consideration, Fact, Favor, Former, Hoffman, Issues, Liability, Them, Watkins
Filed Date： 4/13/1978
Precedential Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/13/2024