Dobranski v. Shertz , 300 Pa. Super. 59 ( 1982 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM:

    The appeal in this case was taken from the following order: “AND NOW this 27th day of Sept., 1979, the rule to *60show cause why plaintiffs should not be allowed leave to file their reply to defendant’s New Matter nunc pro tunc is denied and discharged.” This is not a final appealable order. See Pa.R.A.P. 301.

    Appeal quashed, and case remanded to the lower court for further proceedings.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 2128

Citation Numbers: 300 Pa. Super. 59, 445 A.2d 1297, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4251

Judges: Cavanaugh, Hester, Voort

Filed Date: 5/21/1982

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024