Com. v. Bell, A. ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • J-S70020-14
    NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA                     IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
    PENNSYLVANIA
    Appellee
    v.
    ANTONIO R. BELL
    Appellant                 No. 877 EDA 2014
    Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence January 23, 2014
    In the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County
    Criminal Division at No(s): CP-15-CR-001609-2003
    BEFORE: LAZARUS, J., MUNDY, J., and STRASSBURGER, J.*
    JUDGMENT ORDER BY MUNDY, J.:                      FILED OCTOBER 30, 2014
    Appellant, Antonio R. Bell, appeals from the January 23, 2014
    aggregate judgment of sentence of 38 months and five days to 60 months’ 1
    imprisonment following the revocation of his parole and probation.       After
    careful review, we quash this appeal.
    As noted above, on January 23, 2014, the trial court found Appellant
    in violation of his parole and probation and imposed the above-mentioned
    sentence.      On January 31, 2014, Appellant filed a timely motion for
    ____________________________________________
    *
    Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
    1
    Based on technical violations as well as his conviction for new offenses in
    Bucks County, Appellant was sentenced to 14 months and five days’
    imprisonment for the remaining portion of his revoked parole sentence, and
    a consecutive two to five years’ imprisonment for revocation of his
    probation.
    J-S70020-14
    reconsideration of sentence pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal
    Procedure 708(E), which the trial court denied on February 18, 2014.                On
    March 18, 2014, Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.2
    Before we may entertain Appellant’s appeal, we must first determine
    whether we have jurisdiction. We may raise issues concerning our appellate
    jurisdiction sua sponte. Commonwealth v. Andre, 
    17 A.3d 951
    , 957-958
    (Pa.   Super.    2011).       In   order   to   invoke   our   appellate   jurisdiction,
    Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 903 requires that “the notice of
    appeal … be filed within 30 days of the imposition of the judgment of
    sentence in open court.”           Pa.R.A.P. 903(c).     Since this filing period is
    jurisdictional in nature, it must be strictly construed and “may not be
    extended as a matter of indulgence or grace.”            Commonwealth v. Pena,
    
    31 A.3d 704
    , 706 (Pa. Super. 2011) (citation omitted).              In addition, Rule
    708(E) states that “[t]he filing of a motion to modify sentence will not toll
    the 30-day appeal period.” Pa.R.Crim.P. 708(E); accord Commonwealth
    v. Heilman, 
    876 A.2d 1021
    , 1026 (Pa. Super. 2005) (citations omitted).
    In this case, Appellant was sentenced on January 23, 2014. Although
    Appellant filed a timely motion to modify sentence, this did not toll the Rule
    ____________________________________________
    2
    We note that on an alternative basis, this Court could quash Appellant’s
    appeal for filing a pro se notice of appeal while also represented by counsel,
    as “the disapproval of hybrid representation is effective at all levels.”
    Commonwealth v. Cooper, 
    27 A.3d 994
    , 1000 n.9 (Pa. 2011) (citation
    omitted).
    -2-
    J-S70020-14
    903 filing period. As a result, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due within 30
    days of the imposition of sentence, i.e., by February 24, 2014.3 Appellant
    filed the instant notice of appeal on March 18, 2014, 22 days past the Rule
    903 filing deadline.4
    Based on the foregoing, we conclude that Appellant’s notice of appeal
    was untimely, as it was filed 54 days after the trial court imposed Appellant’s
    sentence in open court.          Accordingly, we conclude that we are without
    jurisdiction, and quash this appeal.
    Appeal quashed.
    Judgment Entered.
    Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
    Prothonotary
    Date: 10/30/2014
    ____________________________________________
    3
    We observe that the 30th day fell on Saturday, February 22, 2014. When
    computing the 30-day filing period, “[if] the last day of any such period shall
    fall on Saturday or Sunday … such day shall be omitted from the
    computation.” 1 Pa.C.S.A. § 1908. Therefore, the 30th day for Appellant to
    file a timely notice of appeal was Monday, February 24, 2014.
    4
    We note the trial court informed Appellant at sentencing of the ten-day
    period to file an optional motion for modification of sentence, as well as the
    30-day filing period for a notice of appeal. N.T., 1/23/14, at 26.
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 877 EDA 2014

Filed Date: 10/30/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014