Com. v. Haley, M. ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • J-S43040-15
    NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA                        IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
    PENNSYLVANIA
    Appellee
    v.
    MICHAEL LEON HALEY SR.
    Appellant                   No. 3522 EDA 2014
    Appeal from the PCRA Order October 20, 2014
    In the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County
    Criminal Division at No(s): CP-39-CR-0002297-2004;
    CP-39-CR-0002527-2004
    BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., PANELLA, J., and OLSON, J.
    JUDGMENT ORDER BY GANTMAN, P.J.:                          FILED JULY 21, 2015
    Appellant, Michael Leon Haley Sr., appeals from the order entered in
    the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, which dismissed his second
    petition filed under the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”).1 We affirm.
    Following a jury trial, Appellant was convicted of attempted criminal
    homicide, aggravated assault, recklessly endangering another person,
    terroristic threats, theft by unlawful taking, and unauthorized use of
    automobiles and other vehicles.           On April 8, 2005, the court sentenced
    Appellant to an aggregate term of twenty-five (25) to fifty (50) years’
    imprisonment. This Court affirmed the judgment of sentence on September
    ____________________________________________
    1
    42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546.
    J-S43040-15
    15, 2006. See Commonwealth v. Haley, 
    911 A.2d 180
    (Pa.Super. 2006)
    (unpublished memorandum). Appellant did not seek further direct review.
    On May 22, 2007, Appellant filed his first PCRA petition, which the court
    denied on June 26, 2009.      This Court affirmed on May 4, 2010.         See
    Commonwealth v. Haley, 
    996 A.2d 542
    (Pa.Super. 2010) (unpublished
    memorandum). Appellant filed the current PCRA petition on August 1, 2014.
    On September 8, 2014, the PCRA court issued Pa.R.Crim.P. 907 notice;
    Appellant filed a response on September 29, 2014. On October 20, 2014,
    the court dismissed Appellant’s petition as untimely. Appellant filed a timely
    notice of appeal on November 14, 2014. The court ordered Appellant to file
    a concise statement of errors complained of on appeal pursuant to Pa.R.A.P.
    1925(b), and Appellant timely complied.
    The timeliness of a PCRA petition is a jurisdictional requisite.
    Commonwealth v. Hackett, 
    598 Pa. 350
    , 
    956 A.2d 978
    (2008). A PCRA
    petition must be filed within one year of the date the underlying judgment
    becomes final. 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545(b)(1). A judgment is deemed final at
    the conclusion of direct review or at the expiration of time for seeking
    review. 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545(b)(3). The three statutory exceptions to the
    PCRA’s timeliness provisions allow for very limited circumstances under
    which the late filing of a petition will be excused.    See 42 Pa.C.S.A. §
    9545(b)(1). A petitioner asserting a timeliness exception must file a petition
    within 60 days of the date the claim could have been presented.            42
    -2-
    J-S43040-15
    Pa.C.S.A. § 9545(b)(2).
    Instantly, although styled as a “habeas corpus petition,” Appellant’s
    claims are cognizable under the PCRA. See Commonwealth v. Concordia,
    
    97 A.3d 366
    (Pa.Super. 2014) (stating challenge to legality of sentence is
    cognizable under PCRA).      Therefore, the PCRA court properly treated
    Appellant’s petition as a serial PCRA petition subject to the PCRA’s time
    restrictions. See 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9542 (stating PCRA shall be sole means of
    obtaining collateral relief and encompasses all other common law and
    statutory remedies for same purpose); Commonwealth v. Deaner, 
    779 A.2d 578
    (Pa.Super. 2001) (stating any collateral petition raising issues with
    respect to remedies offered under PCRA will be considered PCRA petition).
    Appellant’s judgment of sentence became final on October 15, 2006, upon
    expiration of the time to file a petition for allowance of appeal with our
    Supreme Court. See Pa.R.A.P. 1113(a). Appellant filed the current PCRA
    petition on August 1, 2014, more than seven years after his judgment of
    sentence became final. Thus, Appellant’s petition is patently untimely. See
    42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545(b)(1). Appellant made no attempt to plead and prove
    any exception to the PCRA’s time restrictions under Section 9545(b)(1).
    Thus, the court properly dismissed the petition as time-barred.
    Order affirmed.
    -3-
    J-S43040-15
    Judgment Entered.
    Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
    Prothonotary
    Date: 7/21/2015
    -4-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 3522 EDA 2014

Filed Date: 7/21/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/13/2024