-
Argued April 10, 1946. The plaintiff brought an action in assumpsit against defendant and asked for an accounting under section 11 *Page 45 of the Practice Act of 1915, as amended, 12 Pa.C.S.A. § 393. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. The court below dismissed defendant's motions for a new trial and judgment n.o.v. and directed that judgment be entered on the verdict, upon payment of the jury fee. Defendant has appealed.
It is well settled that a judgment for an accounting is interlocutory and not appealable: Miller v. Belmont P. RubberCo.,
268 Pa. 51 ,66 ,110 A. 802 ; Hall v. Haines,38 Pa. Super. 517 .The appeal is quashed at the costs of appellant.
Document Info
Docket Number: Appeal, 105
Judges: Baldrige, Rhodes, Hirt, Reno, Dithrich, Ross, Arnold
Filed Date: 4/10/1946
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024