-
J-S39014-14 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVOLUNTARY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO PENNSYLVANIA A.S-A.R. AND P.N.R. APPEAL OF: J.L.R., NATURAL FATHER No. 162 WDA 2014 Appeal from the Decrees December 27, 2013 In the Court of Common Pleas of Venango County Orphans' Court at No(s): O.C.D. NO. 190-2013 O.C.D. NO. 191-2013 BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., WECHT, J. and PLATT, J.* MEMORANDUM BY BENDER, P.J.E.: FILED AUGUST 29, 2014 parental rights to A.S-A.R. (born in April of 2002) and P.N.R. (born in May of affirm. which they asserted inter alia that Stepfather wished to adopt the Children. A hearing was held on October 1, 2013, after which the court granted the termination petitions. See timely notice of appeal and a concise statement of errors complained of on appeal pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a)(2)(i). Thereafter, Father filed a Motion to Amend Concise Statement with this Court, which we granted. This Court directed that the record should be remanded to allow the trial court to file an amended Rule 1925(a) opinion responding to the additional issues raised by *Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. J-S39014-14 See The matter is now ripe for review. Father raises three issues for our review: 1. The [c]ourt erred in determining that evidence so clear, direct, weighty, and convincing was presented to enable the fact finder to come to a clear decision without hesitancy that the [c]ourt failed to consider other factors in making its determination including the nature of the relationship between the father and minor children prior to incarceration and the incarcerated and the natural[] m 2. The [c]ourt erred in determining the best interests of the rights. 3. The [c]ourt erred when it improperly considered extremely prejudicial evidence not presented or properly before the [c]ourt commercial burglaries which occurred after the hearing and were not made part of the record as well as statements from another jurisdiction made at sentencing hearing and other evidence that was not presented or properly before the [c]ourt for consideration. When considering an appeal from an order involuntarily terminating parental rights, we are guided by the following: In cases involving termination of parental rights, our scope of review is broad. All of the evidence, as well as the trial court's factual and legal determinations, are to be considered. However, our standard of review is limited to determining -2- J-S39014-14 whether the order of the trial court is supported by competent evidence, and whether the trial court gave adequate consideration to the effect of such a decree on the welfare of the child. We have always been deferential to the trial court as the fact finder, as the determiner of the credibility of witnesses, and as the sole and final arbiter of all conflicts in the evidence. In re S.D.T., Jr.,
934 A.2d 703, 705-06 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied,
597 Pa. 68,
950 A.2d 270(2008) (citations omitted). The burden of proof in a termination case is on the petitioning party, who must establish valid grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence. In re E.M.I.,
57 A.3d 1278, 1284 (Pa. Super. 2012) (quoting In re J.L.C.,
837 A.2d 1247, 1251 (Pa. Super. 2003)). We have reviewed the certified record, the briefs of the parties, the applicable law, and the two comprehensive opinions authored by the Honorable Oliver J. Lobaugh of the Court of Common Pleas of Venango County, issued on December 27, 2013, and on March 12, 2014. We -reasoned opinions properly dispose of the issues raised by Father. Accordingly, we adopt Judge basis. Decrees affirmed. -3- J-S39014-14 Judgment Entered. Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary Date: 8/29/2014 -4- Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM Circulated 08/20/2014 09:15 AM
Document Info
Docket Number: 162 WDA 2014
Filed Date: 8/29/2014
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021