Com. v. Edwards, B. ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • J-S48025-14
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,                    IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
    PENNSYLVANIA
    Appellant
    v.
    BASHEIR FAKHA EDWARDS,
    Appellee                 No. 2183 MDA 2013
    Appeal from the Order Entered October 25, 2013
    in the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County
    Criminal Division at No.: CP-40-CR-0000294-2013
    BEFORE: DONOHUE, J., JENKINS, J., and PLATT, J.*
    DISSENTING STATEMENT BY PLATT, J.:              FILED SEPTEMBER 18, 2014
    Because I believe that there was sufficient reasonable suspicion to
    justify the motor vehicle stop at issue, I respectfully dissent.    I would
    reverse the grant of suppression and remand for trial.
    Sergeant Dale Binker, an experienced police officer, was parked in a
    deserted parking lot at 1:17 a.m.; none of the businesses who used the lot
    were open. (See N.T., 10/22/13, at 4-6, 18). Sergeant Binker observed a
    car, driven by Appellant, traverse the parking lot at a higher than average
    speed and then pull onto a dirt access road leading to land owned by
    Canadian Pacific Railway and a wooded area.         (See 
    id. at 5-6).
      Areas
    surrounding the access road and the woods are private property. (See id.
    ____________________________________________
    *
    Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
    J-S48025-14
    at 5-6; 21-22).       The area is a high-crime area.         (See 
    id. at 6,
    25).
    Specifically, Sergeant Binker testified that, in the area at issue, it was
    common to have numerous stolen cars, illegal dumping, poaching. (See 
    id. at 6,
    15). Sergeant Binker also stated that, because of the wooded location,
    he was concerned about the possibility of a girl being in the car and being
    raped. (See 
    id. at 15-16).
    I believe that this evidence is sufficient to establish reasonable
    suspicion. See Commonwealth v. Downey, 
    39 A.3d 401
    , 406 (Pa. Super.
    2012), appeal denied                                                           lity of
    the circumstances, courts must also afford due weight to the specific,
    experience    and    acknowledge    that    innocent    facts,   when    considered
    collectively, may permit the investigative d
    Commonwealth v. Brown, 
    23 A.3d 544
    , 551 (Pa. Super. 2011) (en banc)
    (combination of experienced police officer and suspicious, although not
    illegal behavior of appellant was sufficient to justify automobile stop);
    Commonwealth v. Hayes, 
    898 A.2d 1089
    , 1094 (Pa. Super. 2006)
    innocent behavior, that alone does not make the investigatory detention
    I   would    conclude   that   here,   based   upon     the   totality   of   the
    circumstances,      the   Commonwealth      presented    sufficient   evidence      of
    -2-
    J-S48025-14
    suspicious activity for Sergeant Binker, based on his training and experience,
    to establish reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot. Therefore,
    I would reverse the decision of the trial court granting suppression and
    remand for trial.
    Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2183 MDA 2013

Filed Date: 9/18/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014