Com. v. Allis, R. ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • J-S28028-19
    NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA               :   IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
    :        PENNSYLVANIA
    :
    v.                             :
    :
    :
    RYAN JAMES ALLIS                           :
    :
    Appellant               :   No. 37 MDA 2019
    Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered December 17, 2018
    In the Court of Common Pleas of Bradford County Criminal Division at
    No(s): CP-08-CR-0000510-2018
    BEFORE:      BOWES, J., McLAUGHLIN, J., and STRASSBURGER*, J.
    MEMORANDUM BY McLAUGHLIN, J.:                          FILED AUGUST 14, 2019
    Ryan James Allis appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on
    December 17, 2018, following his guilty plea to Accidents Involving Death or
    Personal Injury, Driving While Operating Privilege Suspended or Revoked, and
    Recklessly Endangering Another Person (“REAP”).1 Allis’s counsel has filed an
    Anders2 brief and a petition to withdraw as counsel. We deny counsel’s
    petition to withdraw and remand with instructions.
    We do not reach the merits of the appeal at this time because counsel
    has not met the requirements to withdraw pursuant to Anders. Among other
    things, an Anders brief must: (1) “provide a summary of the procedural
    ____________________________________________
    *    Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
    1   75 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 3742(a) and 1543(a), and 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 2705, respectively.
    2   Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967).
    J-S28028-19
    history and facts, with citations to the record” and (2) “refer to anything in
    the   record   that   counsel   believes    arguably   supports   the   appeal.”
    Commonwealth v. Santiago, 
    978 A.2d 349
    , 361 (Pa. 2009).
    Counsel maintains that “after a conscientious examination of the entire
    record,” he believes the appeal is frivolous. Anders Br. at 13 (emphasis
    added). Our review reveals that the notes of testimony from the guilty plea
    hearing are not part of the certified record. Further, it appears that counsel
    did not request the transcript and that the hearing was never transcribed.
    Without this testimony, “[c]ounsel could not have fulfilled his duty to review
    the entire record for any non-frivolous issues.” Commonwealth v. Flowers,
    
    113 A.3d 1246
    , 1250 (Pa.Super. 2015) (denying petition to withdraw as
    counsel and remanding case where counsel failed to include notes of testimony
    from guilty plea hearing in certified record).
    Accordingly, we deny counsel’s petition to withdraw and remand for
    counsel to obtain the missing notes of testimony and to file a new Anders
    brief and petition to withdraw or an advocate’s brief, within 60 days from the
    date of this order.
    Petition denied. Case remanded with instructions. Jurisdiction retained.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 37 MDA 2019

Filed Date: 8/14/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/13/2024