Com. v. Martz, D. ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • J-S67044-19
    NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA               :   IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
    :        PENNSYLVANIA
    :
    v.                             :
    :
    :
    DERECK MICHAEL MARTZ                       :
    :
    Appellant               :   No. 1528 MDA 2018
    Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered March 9, 2018
    In the Court of Common Pleas of Montour County Criminal Division at
    No(s): CP-47-CR-0000029-2014
    BEFORE:      OLSON, J., DUBOW, J., and STEVENS, P.J.E.*
    MEMORANDUM BY STEVENS, P.J.E.:                 FILED: MARCH 6, 2020
    Appellant, Dereck Michael Martz, appeals from the judgment of sentence
    entered after a jury convicted him of rape of a child, involuntary deviate sexual
    intercourse, statutory sexual assault, aggravated indecent assault, and
    indecent assault for actions he committed from age 13 to age 17 against a
    child under 13 years old.           For the following reasons, we remand with
    instructions to the trial court for further action and retain jurisdiction.
    On February 27, 2018, the trial court sentenced Appellant to an
    aggregate sentence of 12 to 50 years’ incarceration. Appellant filed a timely
    post-sentence motion on March 8, 2018. The trial court docket indicates that
    a hearing on the motion was scheduled for April 13, 2018. On April 13, 2018,
    the court conducted the hearing, after which it ordered the parties to file briefs
    ____________________________________________
    *   Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.
    J-S67044-19
    on the matters raised within 45 days. At the same hearing, the court also
    ordered Appellant to register as a lifetime sex offender under Pennsylvania’s
    Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 42 Pa.C.S. §§
    9799.10- 9799.42.
    With respect to the briefing schedule, the trial court granted the
    Commonwealth’s request for a briefing extension and set a new date of June
    12, 2018. The Commonwealth filed its answer to Appellant’s post-sentence
    motion on that date. The trial court docket, however, does not indicate that
    the court ruled on Appellant’s motion and, after the expiration of 120 days,
    no order was entered denying the motion by operation of law. Appellant filed
    the instant notice of appeal on July 31, 2018.
    A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order
    being appealed. See Pa.R.A.P. 903(a); Commonwealth v. Moir, 
    766 A.2d 1253
    (Pa.Super. 2000). If the defendant files a timely post-sentence motion,
    the notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order
    deciding the motion. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 720(A)(2)(a).
    A trial court has 120 days to decide a post-sentence motion, and if it
    fails to decide the motion within that period, the motion is deemed denied by
    operation of law. When the motion is deemed denied by operation of law, the
    clerk of courts shall enter an order deeming the motion denied on behalf of
    the trial court and serve copies on the parties. See Pa.Crim.P. 720(B)(3)(c).
    The notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order
    denying the motion by operation of law. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 720(A)(2)(b).
    -2-
    J-S67044-19
    Thus, “[i]f post-sentencing motions are timely filed ... the judgment of
    sentence does not become final for purposes of appeal until the trial court
    disposes of the motion, or the motion is denied by operation of law.”
    Commonwealth v. Borrero, 
    692 A.2d 158
    , 159 (Pa.Super. 1997). Further,
    when the 120–day period afforded to the trial court to rule on a post-sentence
    motion expires, the judgment of sentence is not final for purposes of appeal
    until an order denying it by operation of law is entered on the docket; this is
    because “the entry of an appropriate order is a prerequisite to this court's
    exercise of jurisdiction.” 
    Id. at 160;
    see also Commonwealth v.
    Shamberger, 
    788 A.2d 408
    , 410 n. 2 (Pa.Super. 2001) (noting that in a
    criminal action, the judgment of sentence is made final by an order denying
    post-sentence motions).
    Inexplicably, the clerk of courts has never entered an order indicating
    that Appellant’s post-sentence motion was denied by operation of law, as
    required by Pa.R.Crim.P. 720(B)(3)(c). Accordingly, we remand this case to
    the trial court. The trial court shall order the clerk of courts to comply with
    the procedure contained in Pa.R.Crim.P 720(B)(3)(c) within 10 days of the
    date of this decision, and to provide this Court with a copy of the order entered
    and an updated docket sheet reflecting the entry of this order on the docket.
    Once this procedural error has been corrected, we will proceed to the merits
    of Appellant’s appeal.
    Case remanded. Jurisdiction retained.
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1528 MDA 2018

Filed Date: 3/6/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/6/2020