Joshua Davis v. State of Rhode Island , 2015 R.I. LEXIS 105 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                     Supreme Court
    No. 2013-263-Appeal.
    (PM 10-4824)
    Joshua Davis                   :
    v.                       :
    State of Rhode Island.              :
    ORDER
    This appeal from the Superior Court’s denial of an application for postconviction relief
    came before the Supreme Court pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show
    cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. After a close review
    of the record and careful consideration of the parties’ arguments (both written and oral), we are
    satisfied that cause has not been shown and that this appeal may be decided at this time.
    On April 17, 2008, Joshua Davis pled guilty to one count of first-degree murder, in
    violation of G.L. 1956 § 11-23-1 and § 11-23-2; one count of first-degree child molestation, in
    violation of G.L. 1956 § 11-37-8.1 and § 11-37-8.2; and one count of kidnapping of a minor, in
    violation of G.L. 1956 § 11-26-1.4. On June 25, 2008, Mr. Davis was sentenced to life in prison
    without parole on the murder count, life in prison on the count of first-degree child molestation
    to be served consecutive to his sentence on the first count, and life in prison on the charge of
    kidnapping of a minor to be served consecutive to his sentences on the first two counts. Mr.
    Davis filed an application for postconviction relief on August 18, 2010, alleging six separate
    -1-
    grounds for relief. After reviewing all the evidence, his court-appointed attorney filed a seventy-
    five page “no-merit” memorandum and moved to withdraw from the case, in accordance with the
    procedures outlined by this Court in Shatney v. State, 
    755 A.2d 130
    , 135 (R.I. 2000). The
    attorney was permitted to withdraw during a hearing in the Superior Court on July 27, 2011. The
    hearing justice then said that a separate hearing with respect to the merits of the postconviction
    relief application would be held at a later date; she did so in order to give Mr. Davis time to draft
    a memorandum and prepare for the further hearing. On November 15, 2011, almost four months
    after the hearing in which his court-appointed attorney was permitted to withdraw, Mr. Davis
    was afforded a hearing on his application. At the end of that hearing, the hearing justice denied
    Mr. Davis’s application for postconviction relief. Mr. Davis contends on appeal that he was not
    given an adequate opportunity to make his argument to the Superior Court.
    The record indicates that Mr. Davis was given the opportunity to address his court-
    appointed attorney’s “no-merit” memorandum at the July 27, 2011 hearing. At the November
    15, 2011 hearing, the hearing justice afforded Mr. Davis the opportunity to address his
    contentions. However, it is undisputed that Mr. Davis (a person serving a sentence of life
    without parole) did not receive an evidentiary hearing. It will be recalled that, on May 21, 2012,
    this Court ruled as follows: “[F]rom this point forward, an evidentiary hearing is required in the
    first application for postconviction relief in all cases involving applicants sentenced to life
    without the possibility of parole.” Tassone v. State, 
    42 A.3d 1277
    , 1287 (R.I. 2012). We
    acknowledge that our decision in Tassone had not been issued at the time of the above-described
    hearings relative to Mr. Davis’s motion for postconviction relief and that it was prospective in
    nature. Nevertheless, taking into account both the fact that Mr. Davis was sentenced to life
    without parole on one of the counts of which he stands convicted after entering a guilty plea and
    -2-
    the particular circumstances of this case and bearing in mind the interests of justice, we have
    concluded that Mr. Davis should be afforded an evidentiary hearing.
    Accordingly, we remand this case to the Superior Court with directions to appoint new
    counsel and to conduct an evidentiary hearing on Mr. Davis’s application for postconviction
    relief.
    Entered as an Order of this Court, this 12th day of November, 2015.
    By Order,
    /s/
    Clerk
    Justice Indeglia did not participate.
    -3-
    RHODE ISLAND SUPREME COURT CLERK’S OFFICE
    Clerk’s Office Order/Opinion Cover Sheet
    TITLE OF CASE:      Joshua Davis v. State of Rhode Island.
    CASE NO:            No. 2013-263-Appeal.
    (PM 10-4824)
    COURT:              Supreme Court
    DATE ORDER FILED:   November 12, 2015
    JUSTICES:           Suttell, C.J., Goldberg, Flaherty, and Robinson, JJ.
    WRITTEN BY:         N/A – Court Order
    SOURCE OF APPEAL:   Providence County Superior Court
    JUDGE FROM LOWER COURT:
    Associate Justice Susan E. McGuirl
    ATTORNEYS ON APPEAL:
    For Applicant: Christopher S. Gontarz, Esq.
    For Defendant: Jeanine P. McConaghy
    Department of Attorney General
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2013-263-APPEAL

Citation Numbers: 124 A.3d 428, 2015 R.I. LEXIS 105

Judges: Indeglia

Filed Date: 11/12/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/26/2024