Hubbard, Trustee v. Pearce ( 1863 )

Bratton, J.

The case which purports to be brought here by this bill of exceptions, was tried in, a special Court of Common Pleas. A jury trial was waived, and the case was heard upon law and fact by the Judge of that court.

It was an action of ejectment. The bill of exceptions states, that it contained two counts against the defendant, — one, as tenant at will, and the other, as tenant at sufferance : and after stating that certain facts were proved, proceeds to state the oral testimony given by the plaintiff, on the one side, and the defendant, on the other. The bill then states the ruling excepted to, viz.: “ and upon this testimony the judge trying the cause ruled, that it supported neither count of the declaration.”

The statiite which gives a bill of exceptions from a special Court of Common Pleas, gives it only where the.ruling is in a matter of law. Ch. 192, section 11, of the Revised Statutes, provides, that in such case the party aggrieved “ shall be entitled to have such matter heard before, and decided by, the Supreme Court,” but in no other. The bill of exceptions in this case states no proposition of law upon which the court below made any ruling, or gave any opinion, direction, or judgment in the case. It does state that the Judge was of opinion that the testimony was insufficient. This it was his province also to weigh, as a jury would have done: and when the Judge says that the evidence was insufficient, he says, in effect, that it is not sufficient to establish in his mind those facts which constitute a tenancy at will, or a tenancy at sufferance. The error, if any, by which the plaintiff is aggrieved, is a ruling in a matter of fact, and not of law; and such matter the party is not entitled to have heard before this court. Over it the bill of exceptions can give us no jurisdiction.

The plaintiff’s bill of exceptions must be dismissed with costs.