Donovan C. Woodruff v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                    Supreme Court
    No. 2013-207-Appeal.
    Donovan C. Woodruff et al.              :
    v.                         :
    Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems,       :
    Inc., et al.
    ORDER
    The plaintiffs, Donovan C. Woodruff and Cynthia L. Woodruff, appeal from an entry of
    summary judgment in favor of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) and
    Signature Group Holdings, Inc. This case came before the Supreme Court at a session in
    conference pursuant to Article I, Rule 12A(3)(b) of the Supreme Court Rules of Appellate
    Procedure.   The plaintiffs contend that the assignment of their mortgage and subsequent
    foreclosure on the mortgage were both invalid. At this time, we proceed to decide this case
    without further briefing and argument.
    On appeal the plaintiffs argue that questions of fact in the case precluded the entry of
    summary judgment.       However, the plaintiffs have failed to submit competent evidence
    demonstrating the existence of questions of material fact. See Mruk v. Mortgage Electronic
    Registration Systems, Inc., 
    82 A.3d 527
    , 532 (R.I. 2013) (party opposing summary judgment
    must submit evidence of substantial nature to dispute questions of material fact). The plaintiffs
    also have offered no competent evidence to support their assertion that the official who executed
    the assignment of their mortgage was not authorized to sign it.
    The plaintiffs further challenge the ability of MERS to assign the mortgage in this case
    and challenge the legality of having the mortgage and promissory note held by separate entities.
    It is well settled that MERS may serve as mortgagee without holding the promissory note and
    has the authority under the terms of the mortgage in this case to assign it. See Ingram v.
    Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., 
    94 A.3d 523
    , 528 (R.I. 2014); Bucci v. Lehman
    Brothers Bank FSB, 
    68 A.3d 1069
    , 1085-89 (R.I. 2013).
    Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ appeal is denied and dismissed.
    Entered as an Order of this Court on this 25th day of September, 2014.
    By Order,
    /s/
    Clerk
    RHODE ISLAND SUPREME COURT CLERK’S OFFICE
    Clerk’s Office Order/Opinion Cover Sheet
    TITLE OF CASE:      Donovan C. Woodruff et al. v. Mortgage Electronic Registration
    Systems, Inc. et al.
    CASE NO:            No. 2013-207-Appeal.
    COURT:              Supreme Court
    DATE ORDER FILED:   September 25, 2014
    JUSTICES:           Suttell, C.J., Goldberg, Flaherty, Robinson, and Indeglia, JJ.
    WRITTEN BY:         N/A – Court Order
    SOURCE OF APPEAL:   Providence County Superior Court
    JUDGE FROM LOWER COURT:
    Associate Justice Bennett R. Gallo
    ATTORNEYS ON APPEAL:
    For Plaintiffs: George E. Babcock, Esq.
    For Defendants: Dean J. Wagner, Esq.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2013-207-Appeal

Filed Date: 9/25/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/26/2024