Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemity Co. , 255 S.C. 427 ( 1971 )

Bussey, Justice

(concurring).

I am in accord with the conclusion that the driver of the Burnside vehicle was not operating such with the “consent, express or implied, of the named insured * * However, in accord with the views expressed in my concurring opinion in the recent case of Dearybury, etc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Company, I would remand the cause for consideration of the question of whether or not the driver of the Burnside vehicle was an insured of Hartford by virtue of being a guest in the vehicle. Here, as in Dearybury, substantial rights of minors are involved.