In the Matter of Kristie Ann McAuley , 408 S.C. 402 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Supreme Court
    In the Matter of Kristie Ann McAuley, Respondent.
    Appellate Case No. 2014-000724
    Opinion No. 27399
    Submitted May 8, 2014 – Filed June 18, 2014
    DEFINITE SUSPENSION
    Lesley M. Coggiola, Disciplinary Counsel, and C. Tex
    Davis, Jr., Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, both of
    Columbia, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
    Bruce A. Byrholdt, of Byrholdt Drawdy, LLC, of
    Anderson, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office
    of Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent
    (Agreement) pursuant to Rule 21 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary
    Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court
    Rules (SCACR). In the Agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to
    the imposition of a public reprimand or a definite suspension not to exceed
    eighteen (18) months. She requests any suspension be imposed retroactively to
    August 24, 2011, the date of her interim suspension. In the Matter of McAuley,
    
    396 S.C. 215
    , 
    721 S.E.2d 767
     (2011). In addition, respondent agrees to complete
    the Legal Ethics and Practice Program Ethics School within twelve (12) months of
    reinstatement from any suspension. We accept the Agreement and suspend
    respondent from the practice of law in this state for eighteen (18) months,
    retroactive to August 24, 2011, the date of her interim suspension. Respondent
    shall complete the Legal Ethics and Practice Program Ethics School within twelve
    (12) months of reinstatement to the practice of law. The facts, as set forth in the
    Agreement, are as follows.
    Facts
    Respondent was employed as a full-time attorney with the Tenth Circuit Public
    Defender's Office. During her employment, respondent represented clients who
    were not financially qualified to receive a public defender. In addition, she
    accepted funds from some of the non-qualified clients whom she represented.
    Respondent was arrested and charged with Misconduct in Office by a public
    official. She resigned from the Tenth Circuit Public Defender's Office on August
    22, 2011. The Court placed respondent on interim suspension on August 24, 2011.
    
    Id.
    On January 16, 2014, respondent pled guilty to Misconduct in Office by a public
    official. She was ordered to pay a $100.00 fine and various court costs. On the
    same day, respondent paid in full the fine and all court costs.
    Law
    Respondent admits that by her conduct she has violated the following provisions of
    the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR: Rule 5.5(a) (lawyer shall
    not practice law in violation of regulation of legal profession); Rule 8.4(a) (it is
    professional misconduct for lawyer to violate Rules of Professional Conduct); and
    Rule 8.4(b) (it is professional misconduct for lawyer to commit criminal act that
    reflects adversely on lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as lawyer in other
    respects). Respondent also admits she has violated the following Rules for Lawyer
    Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR: Rule 7(a)(1) (it shall be ground for
    discipline for lawyer to violate Rules of Professional Conduct) and Rule 7(a)(5) (it
    shall be ground for discipline for lawyer to engage in conduct tending to pollute
    administration of justice or bring courts or legal profession into disrepute or
    conduct demonstrating an unfitness to practice law).
    Conclusion
    We accept the Agreement for Discipline by Consent and suspend respondent from
    the practice of law in this state for eighteen (18) months, retroactive to August 24,
    2011, the date of her interim suspension. If reinstated to the practice of law,
    respondent shall complete the Legal Ethics and Practice Program within twelve
    (12) months of the date of her reinstatement and shall, within ten (10) days after
    completion of the program, submit proof of completion to the Commission on
    Lawyer Conduct. Within fifteen (15) days of the date of this opinion, respondent
    shall file an affidavit with the Clerk of Court showing that she has complied with
    Rule 30 of Rule 413, SCACR.
    DEFINITE SUSPENSION.
    TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ.,
    concur.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Appellate Case 2014-000724; 27399

Citation Numbers: 408 S.C. 402, 759 S.E.2d 743, 2014 WL 2805237, 2014 S.C. LEXIS 191

Judges: Toal, Pleicones, Beatty, Kittredge, Hearn

Filed Date: 6/18/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024