-
Justice HEARN. Respectfully, I dissent. For the reasons discussed in my dissent in State v. Dykes, 403 S.C. 499, 744 S.E.2d 505 (2013), I believe the initial imposition of satellite monitoring without an individualized determination of Nation’s likelihood of reoffending violates his right to substantive due process. I would therefore find Section 23-3-540(C) of the South Carolina Code
*483 (Supp.2013) unconstitutional, and would reverse and remand for a hearing to determine whether satellite monitoring should be imposed.BEATTY, J., concurs.
Document Info
Docket Number: Appellate Case 2011-199726; 27408
Citation Numbers: 408 S.C. 474, 759 S.E.2d 428, 2014 WL 2959122, 2014 S.C. LEXIS 215
Judges: Beatty, Hearn, Kittredge, Pleicones, Toal
Filed Date: 7/2/2014
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024