In the Matter of Elizabeth Anne Perkins ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                     THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Supreme Court
    In the Matter of Elizabeth Anne Perkins, Respondent.
    Appellate Case No. 2022-001257
    Opinion No. 28119
    Submitted September 23, 2022 – Filed October 12, 2022
    DEFINITE SUSPENSION
    Disciplinary Counsel John S. Nichols and Assistant
    Disciplinary Counsel Jamie E. Wilson, both of Columbia,
    for the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
    George M. Pappas, Jr., of Rikard & Protopapas, LLC, of
    Columbia, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: In this attorney disciplinary matter, Respondent and the Office
    of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by
    Consent (Agreement) pursuant to Rule 21 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary
    Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court
    Rules (SCACR). In the Agreement, Respondent admits misconduct, consents to
    any sanction ranging from a confidential admonition to a definite suspension of six
    months, and agrees to two years of alcohol monitoring as a condition of
    reinstatement. We accept the Agreement and suspend Respondent from the
    practice of law in this state for a period of six months. The facts, as set forth in the
    Agreement, are as follows.
    I.
    On January 14, 2022, after engaging in a verbal dispute with her fiancé,
    Respondent went to her vehicle and retrieved a number of personal items,
    including her firearm. Respondent then attempted to remove herself from the
    dispute with her fiancé by locking herself in the bedroom. Respondent's fiancé
    broke into the bedroom, at which time he and Respondent engaged in a physical
    altercation. Respondent was in actual possession of the firearm during the
    altercation. As Respondent's fiancé attempted to disarm her, the firearm
    accidentally discharged. As a result of the altercation, Respondent sustained
    bruising to her arms, and Respondent's fiancé sustained a significant bite mark on
    his neck.
    On the night of the incident, law enforcement observed Respondent smelling of
    alcohol and using slurred speech. Respondent was charged with one misdemeanor
    count of third-degree domestic violence. Respondent self-reported this charge to
    ODC on January 28, 2022. On March 10, 2022, this Court placed Respondent on
    interim suspension. In re Perkins, S.C. Sup. Ct. Order dated Mar. 10, 2022
    (Howard Adv. Sh. No. 11 at 15).
    Following the incident, Respondent contacted Lawyers Helping Lawyers (LHL)
    for assistance and subsequently entered into a one-year monitoring contract.
    Additionally, Respondent admitted herself into an intensive outpatient program
    with Prisma Health Behavioral Care Day Treatment. Respondent successfully
    completed the outpatient program and was discharged on April 20, 2022.
    On April 6, 2022, the Fifth Judicial Circuit Solicitor's Office exercised
    prosecutorial discretion and dismissed the charge against Respondent. On May 17,
    2022, the charge against Respondent was expunged from her public record.
    II.
    Respondent admits her conduct violated Rule 8.4(b), RPC, Rule 407, SCACR
    (prohibiting a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's fitness as a
    lawyer). Respondent further admits her conduct is a ground for discipline under
    the following Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR:
    Rule 7(a)(1) (providing a violation of the Rules of Professional conduct is a ground
    for discipline); and Rule 7(a)(5) (providing conduct demonstrating an unfitness to
    practice law is a ground for discipline).1
    1
    Respondent's disciplinary history includes a six-month definite suspension as a
    result of her failure to comply with the conditions of her admission to practice law.
    In re Perkins, S.C. Sup. Ct. Order dated Mar. 28, 2019; see also In re Perkins, 
    428 S.C. 543
    , 
    836 S.E.2d 693
     (2019) (reinstating her to the practice of law and
    requiring continued compliance with an LHL monitoring contract).
    In the Agreement, Respondent agrees to the following conditions of reinstatement:
    (1) compliance with a two-year monitoring with LHL; and (2) quarterly reporting
    to the Commission on Lawyer Conduct by Respondent's treating physician
    regarding her diagnosis, treatment compliance, and prognosis, for a period of two
    years.
    III.
    We accept the Agreement and suspend Respondent from the practice of law for a
    period of six months, retroactive to the date of her interim suspension. Should
    Respondent be reinstated to the practice of law, she shall be required to enter into a
    two-year monitoring agreement with LHL, the terms of which shall include
    random drug and alcohol screening and regular attendance at Alcoholics
    Anonymous meetings. She shall also be required to provide quarterly reports from
    her treating provider regarding her diagnosis, treatment compliance, and prognosis
    for a period of two years.
    DEFINITE SUSPENSION.
    BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 28119

Filed Date: 10/12/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/12/2022