Hampton v. Richland County Council , 296 S.C. 72 ( 1988 )


Menu:
  • Harwell, Justice

    (concurring):

    *73Petitioners brought this action to overturn Richland County Council’s refusal to rezone their property as C-3 (General Commercial). We granted certiorari to review the opinion of the Court of Appeals which upheld Council’s decision.

    This Court will not overturn the decision of a zoning authority unless the decision is not fairly debatable. Rushing v. City of Greenville, 265 S. C. 285, 217 S. E. (2d) 797 (1975). A decision is not fairly debatable if it is so unreasonable as to impair or destroy a Constitutional right. Id.

    While I question the wisdom of Council’s decision, I can not say that the decision is not fairly debatable. Therefore, I agree that the writ of certiorari was improvidently granted.

Document Info

Docket Number: 22887

Citation Numbers: 296 S.C. 72, 370 S.E.2d 714, 1988 S.C. LEXIS 91

Judges: Chandler, Finney, Gregory, Harwell, Ness

Filed Date: 7/11/1988

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024