State Ex Rel. Shull v. Manning, Governor , 104 S.C. 260 ( 1916 )


Menu:
  • The following order was made

    Per Curiam.

    Upon due consideration of the within petition, the Court is of opinion that the petitioners have failed to make such showing as calls for this issuance of the writ prayed for. It is, therefore, ordered that the petition be dismissed.

    Footnote. — As to noninterference by the judiciary with executive action, see State v. Blease, 80 S. E. 263, not reported in the official reports. Mandamjis in connection with, recall elections, see notes in 50 L. R. A. (N. S.) 229.

Document Info

Docket Number: 9386

Citation Numbers: 88 S.E. 471, 104 S.C. 260, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 109

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 4/18/1916

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024