Ex parte Hartford Fire v. Centex Homes ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Supreme Court
    Ex parte Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Hartford
    Casualty Insurance Company, American Empire Surplus
    Lines Insurance Company, BITCO General Insurance
    Corporation, Clarendon National Insurance Company,
    Harleysville Insurance Company n/k/a Nationwide
    Insurance Company, Selective Insurance Company,
    Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company, and First
    Mercury Insurance Company, Appellants,
    In re The Havens Condominium Association, Plaintiff,
    v.
    Centex Homes, et al., Defendants.
    The River Crossing Condominium Association, and
    Vincent J. Tamburro, on Behalf of Himself and Others
    Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs,
    v.
    Centex Homes, et al., Defendants.
    The Tanglewood Condominium Association, Plaintiff,
    v.
    Centex Homes, a Nevada General Partnership, et al.,
    Defendants.
    The Woodlands Condominium Association, Plaintiff,
    v.
    Centex Homes, a Nevada General Partnership, et al.,
    Defendants,
    of which The Havens Condominium Association, The
    River Crossing Condominium Association, Vincent J.
    Tamburro, The Tanglewood Condominium Association,
    The Woodlands Condominium Association, and Centex
    Homes are the Respondents.
    Appellate Case No. 2019-001053
    Appeal from Horry County
    Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge
    Memorandum Opinion No. 2020-MO-011
    Submitted October 15, 2020 – Filed October 21, 2020
    AFFIRMED
    Robert C. Calamari, Matthew A. Abee, and Patrick F.
    O'Dea, all of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP,
    of Columbia, for Appellants Harleysville Insurance
    Company, NKA Nationwide, and Selective Insurance
    Company; Clayton B. McCullough and Ross A. Appel,
    both of McCullough Khan, LLC, of Charleston, for
    Appellant American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance
    Company; Lawrence M. Hunter Jr., of Hunter & Foster,
    PA, of Greenville, for Appellant BITCO General
    Insurance Corporation; Neil S. Haldrup, of Wall
    Templeton & Haldrup, PA, of Charleston, and Thomas
    B. Boger, of the Pflug Law Firm, LLC, of Mount
    Pleasant, both for Appellant Clarendon National
    Insurance Company; John S. Wilkerson III and R.
    Hawthorne Barrett, both of Turner Padget Graham &
    Laney, PA, of Charleston, for Appellants Crum & Forster
    Specialty Insurance Company and First Mercury
    Insurance Company; and Mark S. Barrow and Christy E.
    Mahon, both of Sweeny Wingate & Barrow, PA, of
    Columbia, and Steven M. Klepper, of Baltimore,
    Maryland, all for Appellants Hartford Casualty Insurance
    Company and Hartford Fire Insurance Company.
    Phillip W. Segui Jr. and Abigail Y. Bechtol, both of
    Segui Law Firm, of Mount Pleasant, John T. Chakeris, of
    The Chakeris Law Firm, of Charleston, and Shaun W.
    Cranford, of Cranford Law, of Columbia, all for
    Respondents The Havens Condominium Association,
    The River Crossing Condominium Association, Vincent
    J. Tamburro, The Tanglewood Condominium
    Association, and The Woodlands Condominium
    Association; and Amanda K. Anderson and Laura F.
    Locklair, both of Boyle, Leonard & Anderson, PA, of
    Charleston, all for Respondent Centex Homes.
    PER CURIAM: In this construction defect action, the trial court denied motions
    to intervene filed by a number of insurance companies, and the insurance
    companies appealed. We certified the appeal from the court of appeals pursuant to
    Rule 204(b), SCACR, and now affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the
    following authority: Ex parte Builder's Mutual Ins. Co., --- S.C. ---, 
    847 S.E.2d 87
    (2020) (holding (1) insurance companies are not entitled to intervene as a matter of
    right in a construction defect action; (2) the trial court did not abuse its discretion
    in denying the insurance companies permissive intervention; and (3) insurance
    companies have a right to contest coverage under a commercial general liability
    (CGL) policy in a subsequent declaratory judgment action).
    AFFIRMED.
    BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2020-MO-011

Filed Date: 10/21/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2024